This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vernon, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dean, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vernon, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dean, J. M.

PEDIATRICS Vol. 103 No. 1 January 1999, pp. 20-24

Effect of a Pediatric Trauma Response Team on Emergency Department Treatment Time and Mortality of Pediatric Trauma Victims

Received May 21, 1998; accepted August 24, 1998.

Donald D. Vernon*, Ronald A. Furnival*, Kristine W. Hansenparallel , Edma M. Diller§, Robert G. Bolte*, Dale G. Johnson*, Dagger , and J. Michael Dean*

From the Departments of * Pediatrics and Dagger  Pediatric Surgery, and § Intermountain Injury Control Research Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, and parallel  Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Objective.  Delay in the provision of definitive care for critically injured children may adversely effect outcome. We sought to speed care in the emergency department (ED) for trauma victims by organizing a formal trauma response system.

Design.  A case-control study of severely injured children, comparing those who received treatment before and after the creation of a formal trauma response team.

Setting.  A tertiary pediatric referral hospital that is a locally designated pediatric trauma center, and also receives trauma victims from a geographically large area of the Western United States.

Subjects.  Pediatric trauma victims identified as critically injured (designated as "trauma one") and treated by a hospital trauma response team during the first year of its existence. Control patients were matched with subjects by probability of survival scores, and were chosen from pediatric trauma victims treated at the same hospital during the year preceding the creation of the trauma team.

Interventions.  A trauma response team was organized to respond to pediatric trauma victims seen in the ED. The decision to activate the trauma team (designation of patient as "trauma one") is made by the pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physician before patient arrival in the ED, based on data received from prehospital care providers. Activation results in the notification and immediate travel to the ED of a pediatric surgeon, neurosurgeon, emergency physician, intensivist, pharmacist, radiology technician, phlebotomist, and intensive care unit nurse, and mobilization of an operating room team. Most trauma one patients arrived by helicopter directly from accident scenes.

Outcome Measures.  Data recorded included identifying information, diagnosis, time to head computerized tomography, time required for ED treatment, admission Revised Trauma Score, discharge Injury Severity Score, surgical procedures performed, and mortality outcome. Trauma Injury Severity Score methodology was used to calculate the probability of survival and mortality compared with the reference patients of the Major Trauma Outcome Study, by calculation of z score.

Results.  Patients treated in the ED after trauma team initiation had statistically shorter times from arrival to computerized tomography scanning (27 ± 2 vs 21 ± 4 minutes), operating room (63 ± 16 vs 623 ± 27 minutes) and total time in the ED (85 ± 8 vs 821 ± 9 minutes). Calculation of z score showed that survival for the control group was not different from the reference population (z = -0.8068), although survival for trauma-one patients was significantly better than the reference population (z = 2.102).

Conclusion.  Before creation of the trauma team, relevant specialists were individually called to the ED for patient evaluation. When a formal trauma response team was organized, time required for ED treatment of severe trauma was decreased, and survival was better than predicted compared with the reference Major Trauma Outcome Study population.  Key words:  trauma, trauma system, trauma team, pediatric, injury severity, TRISS, probability of survival, children, mortality, outcome.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. M. Wachter, S. A. Flanders, C. Fee, and P. J. Pronovost
Public Reporting of Antibiotic Timing in Patients with Pneumonia: Lessons from a Flawed Performance Measure
Ann Intern Med, July 1, 2008; 149(1): 29 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
E. A. Hunt, S. M. Hohenhaus, X. Luo, and K. S. Frush
Simulation of Pediatric Trauma Stabilization in 35 North Carolina Emergency Departments: Identification of Targets for Performance Improvement
Pediatrics, March 1, 2006; 117(3): 641 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
P. J. Zed
Drug-Related Visits to the Emergency Department
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, October 1, 2005; 18(5): 329 - 335.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
Pediatric Trauma Team Improves Outcomes
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, March 1, 1999; 1999(301): 17 - 17.
[Full Text]