This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Howe, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Howe, R. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Genitourinary Tract

PEDIATRICS Vol. 102 No. 4 October 1998, p. e43

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE:
Cost-effective Treatment of Phimosis

Received Sep 9, 1997; accepted May 18, 1998.

Robert S. Van Howe

From the Department of Pediatrics, Marshfield Clinic---Lakeland Center, Minocqua, Wisconsin.

Objective.  To determine the most cost-effective treatment for phimosis.

Design.  The costs of three treatment strategies for treating phimosis were evaluated using a decision-tree analysis. Three therapeutic approaches were considered: circumcision, preputial plasty (the use of plastic surgical techniques to enlarge the preputial opening without removing tissue), and topical therapy with steroids and nonsteroidal antiinflammatories. Published failure and complication rates were used to calculate the cost per case.

Outcome Measures.  Cost in dollars to treat each case of phimosis.

Results.  Topical steroid therapy was the most cost-effective strategy, costing between $758 and $800 per case. Preputial plasty cost between $2515 and $2580 per case. Circumcision cost between $3009 and $3241 per case.

Conclusions.  The most cost-effective management for treating phimosis is to initiate topical therapy. Daily external application from the tip of the foreskin to the glandis corona with betamethasone 0.05% cream for 4 to 6 weeks has been demonstrated to be very effective, resulting in a 75% savings compared with circumcision. Surgical intervention should not be considered until topical therapy has been given an adequate trial. When contemplating surgery, the lower morbidity, lower costs, and tissue preservation of preputial plasty may make it preferable.  Key words:  phimosis, betamethasone, preputial plasty, circumcision.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Med Decis MakingHome page
R. S. Van Howe
A Cost-Utility Analysis of Neonatal Circumcision
Med Decis Making, November 1, 2004; 24(6): 584 - 601.
[Abstract] [PDF]