This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doron, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Stiles, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doron, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Stiles, A. D.

PEDIATRICS Vol. 102 No. 3 September 1998, pp. 574-582

Delivery Room Resuscitation Decisions for Extremely Premature Infants

Received Jun 1, 1997; accepted Feb 10, 1998.

Mia W. Doron*, Kathleen A. Veness-Meehan*, Lewis H. MargolisDagger , Elizabeth M. Holoman*, and Alan D. Stiles*

From the Departments of * Pediatrics and Dagger  Maternal and Child Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Background.  Neonatologists are criticized for overtreating extremely premature infants who die despite invasive and costly care. Withholding resuscitation at delivery has been recommended as a way to minimize overtreatment. It is not known how decisions to forgo initiating aggressive care are made, or whether this strategy effectively decreases overtreatment.

Objective.  To identify whether physicians' or parents' preferences primarily determine the amount of treatment provided at delivery, to examine factors associated with the provision of resuscitation, and to assess whether resuscitation at delivery significantly postpones death in nonsurvivors.

Methods.  We evaluated delivery room resuscitation decisions and mortality for all infants born at 23 to 26 weeks gestation at the University of North Carolina Hospitals from November 1994 to October 1995. On the day of delivery, the attending neonatologist completed a questionnaire regarding discussion with the parents before delivery, the prognosis for survival estimated before delivery, the degree of certainty about the prognosis, parents' preference for the amount of treatment at delivery, and the degree of influence exerted by parents and physicians on the amount of delivery room treatment provided. Medical records were reviewed for demographics and hospital course.

Results.  Thirty-one of 41 infants were resuscitated (intubation and/or cardiopulmonary resuscitation) at delivery. Resuscitation correlated with increasing gestational age, higher birth weight, estimated prognosis for survival >= 10%, and uncertainty about prognostic accuracy. Physicians saw themselves as primarily responsible for delivery room resuscitation decisions when the parents' wishes about initiating care were unknown, and as equal partners with parents when they agreed on the level of care. When disagreement existed, doctors always thought parents preferred more aggressive resuscitation, and identified parents as responsible for the increased amount of treatment at delivery. Twenty-four infants died before hospital discharge. The median age at death was 2 days when physicians primarily determined the amount of treatment at delivery, 1 day when parents primarily determined the amount of treatment, and <1 day when responsibility was shared equally. The median age at death was <1 day when physicians and parents agreed about the preferred amount of treatment at delivery and 1.5 days when they disagreed. The median age at death was <1 day when parents' preferences were known before delivery and 4 days when parents' preferences were unknown.

Conclusions.  Physicians resuscitated extremely premature infants at delivery when they were very uncertain about an infant's prognosis or when the parents' desires about treatment were unknown. When parents' preferences were known, parents usually determined the amount of treatment provided at delivery. Resuscitation at delivery usually postponed death by only a few days, decreasing prognostic uncertainty and honoring what physicians perceived were parents' wishes for care, without substantially contributing to overtreatment.  Key words:  resuscitation, delivery, prematurity, extremely low birth weight infants, neonatal intensive care, treatment decisions, ethics, futility.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
M. F. Haward, R. O. Murphy, and J. M. Lorenz
Message Framing and Perinatal Decisions
Pediatrics, July 1, 2008; 122(1): 109 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
M. P. McGraw and J. M. Perlman
Attitudes of Neonatologists Toward Delivery Room Management of Confirmed Trisomy 18: Potential Factors Influencing a Changing Dynamic
Pediatrics, June 1, 2008; 121(6): 1106 - 1110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
T. K. Bastek, D. K. Richardson, J. A.F. Zupancic, and J. P. Burns
Prenatal Consultation Practices at the Border of Viability: A Regional Survey
Pediatrics, August 1, 2005; 116(2): 407 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
J. C. Partridge, A. M. Martinez, H. Nishida, N.-Y. Boo, K. W. Tan, C.-Y. Yeung, J.-H. Lu, and V. Y.H. Yu
International Comparison of Care for Very Low Birth Weight Infants: Parents' Perceptions of Counseling and Decision-Making
Pediatrics, August 1, 2005; 116(2): e263 - e271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
H. T. Keenan, M. W. Doron, and B. A. Seyda
Comparison of Mothers' and Counselors' Perceptions of Predelivery Counseling for Extremely Premature Infants
Pediatrics, July 1, 2005; 116(1): 104 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NeoReviewsHome page
R. J. Boyle
Ethical Issues in the Care of the Neonate: Overview
NeoReviews, November 1, 2004; 5(11): e471 - e476.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
J. Kattwinkel and R. Boyle
Is the Glass 10% Empty or 90% Full?
Pediatrics, June 1, 2004; 113(6): 1846 - 1847.
[Full Text]

Home page
 J Child NeurolHome page
G. Verlato, D. Gobber, D. Drago, L. Chiandetti, and P. Drigo
Guidelines for Resuscitation in the Delivery Room of Extremely Preterm Infants
J Child Neurol, January 1, 2004; 19(1): 31 - 34.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
S. Saigal, B. L. Stoskopf, E. Burrows, D. L. Streiner, and P. L. Rosenbaum
Stability of Maternal Preferences for Pediatric Health States in the Perinatal Period and 1 Year Later
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, March 1, 2003; 157(3): 261 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
H. MacDonald and Committee on Fetus and Newborn
Perinatal Care at the Threshold of Viability
Pediatrics, November 1, 2002; 110(5): 1024 - 1027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
D. L. Streiner, S. Saigal, E. Burrows, B. Stoskopf, and P. Rosenbaum
Attitudes of Parents and Health Care Professionals Toward Active Treatment of Extremely Premature Infants
Pediatrics, July 1, 2001; 108(1): 152 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
F. S. Cole
Extremely Preterm Birth -- Defining the Limits of Hope
N. Engl. J. Med., August 10, 2000; 343(6): 429 - 430.
[Full Text]

Home page
 J. Med. EthicsHome page
M. L Gross
Avoiding anomalous newborns: preemptive abortion, treatment thresholds and the case of baby Messenger
J. Med. Ethics, August 1, 2000; 26(4): 242 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
S. Saigal, B. L. Stoskopf, D. Feeny, W. Furlong, E. Burrows, P. L. Rosenbaum, and L. Hoult
Differences in Preferences for Neonatal Outcomes Among Health Care Professionals, Parents, and Adolescents
JAMA, June 2, 1999; 281(21): 1991 - 1997.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
N. N. Finer and K. J. Barrington
Decision-making in Delivery Room Resuscitation: A Team Sport
Pediatrics, September 1, 1998; 102(3): 644 - 644.
[Full Text] [PDF]