PEDIATRICS Vol. 102 No. 2 August 1998, p. e16
Received Feb 2, 1998; accepted Apr 17, 1998.
, and
From the * Departments of Pediatrics and
Nursing, Children's
Hospital of Philadelphia, and § the Leonard Davis Institute, University
of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Objective. Establish prevalence rates of urinary tract infection (UTI) in febrile infants and young girls in an emergency department (ED) by demographics and clinical parameters.
Methods. Cross-sectional prevalence survey of 2411 (83%)
of all infants younger than 12 months and girls younger than 2 years of
age presenting to the ED with a fever (
38.5°C) who did not have a
definite source for their fever and who were not on antibiotics or
immunosuppressed. Otitis media, gastroenteritis, and upper respiratory infection were considered potential but not definite sources of fever.
Results. Overall prevalence of UTI (growth of
104 CFU/mL of a urinary tract pathogen) was 3.3% (95%
confidence interval [CI]: 2.6,4.0). Higher prevalences occurred in
whites (10.7%; 95% CI: 7.1,14.3), girls (4.3%; 95% CI: 3.3,5.3),
uncircumcised boys (8.0%; 95% CI: 1.9,14.1), and those who did not
have another potential source for their fever (5.9%; 95% CI:
3.8,8.0), had a history of UTI (9.3%; 95% CI: 3.0,20.3), malodorous
urine or hematuria (8.6%; 95% CI: 2.8,19.0), appeared "ill"
(5.7%; 95% CI: 4.0,7.4), had abdominal or suprapubic tenderness on
examination (13.2%; 95% CI: 3.7,30.7), or had fever
39°C (3.9%;
95% CI: 3.0,4.8). White girls had a 16.1% (95% CI: 10.6,21.6)
prevalence of UTI.
Conclusions. UTI is prevalent in young children, particularly white girls, without a definite source of fever. Specific clinical signs and symptoms of UTI are uncommon, and the presence of another potential source of fever such as upper respiratory infection or otitis media is not reliable in excluding UTI.
Key words: UTI, evaluation of febrile infants, prevalence.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Shaikh, N. E. Morone, J. Lopez, J. Chianese, S. Sangvai, F. D'Amico, A. Hoberman, and E. R. Wald Does This Child Have a Urinary Tract Infection? JAMA, December 26, 2007; 298(24): 2895 - 2904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. I. Paul and B. M. Pate Bag versus Catheter Urine Specimens in the Diagnosis of UTI in Young Children AAP Grand Rounds, April 1, 2006; 15(4): 40 - 41. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Zorc, D. A. Kiddoo, and K. N. Shaw Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Urinary Tract Infections Clin. Microbiol. Rev., April 1, 2005; 18(2): 417 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Van Howe A Cost-Utility Analysis of Neonatal Circumcision Med Decis Making, November 1, 2004; 24(6): 584 - 601. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J H van der Voort, A G Edwards, R Roberts, R G Newcombe, and K V. Jones Unexplained extra visits to general practitioners before the diagnosis of first urinary tract infection: a case-control study Arch. Dis. Child., December 1, 2002; 87(6): 530 - 532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E. Harkless A clear urine specimen on visual inspection cannot totally exclude a diagnosis of urinary tract infection Evid. Based Nurs., April 1, 2001; 4(2): 55 - 55. [Full Text] |
||||