This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bell, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dana, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bell, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dana, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endocrinology
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 102 No. 2 Supplement August 1998, pp. 518-520

Lack of Correlation Between Growth Hormone Provocative Test Results and Subsequent Growth Rates During Growth Hormone Therapy

Received Feb 6, 1998; accepted Mar 20, 1998.

Jennifer J. Bell* and Ken DanaDagger

From the * Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York; and the Dagger  Department of Medical Affairs, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, California.

Objectives.  To determine whether there is a relationship between the peak GH level in pituitary stimulation tests and the growth rate in response to treatment with recombinant human growth hormone (GH).

Methods.  We identified 24 843 patients in the National Cooperative Growth Study database who had not been treated previously with GH therapy and divided them into three groups according to the peak GH level in pituitary stimulation testing: 1) <10 µg/L (n = 14 132); 2) >= 10 µg/L (n = 7476); and 3) no test results reported (n = 3235). Growth rates in each group in response to GH therapy were examined.

Results.  The children in each of the groups responded to GH therapy with a vigorous increase in growth rates (means, 8.4 to 9.5 cm/y) in the first year, followed by a gradual decline and then stabilization at 1.0 to 1.9 cm/y greater than the pretreatment values. There were large overlaps in the growth rates among the groups, but the differences were significant.

The growth rates in a smaller group of children (n = 187) who had normal GH responses and normal growth rates before GH therapy increased similarly in the first year of therapy (to 7.7 to 9.2 cm/y), but then declined rapidly to the pretreatment values or lower.

Conclusion.  Because the GH response to pituitary stimulation testing is inadequate for diagnosing GH deficiency, such testing also is inadequate for determining whether GH treatment should be prescribed in a child with short stature. In addition, the waning response to GH therapy in normally growing short children suggests that this treatment may not have a sustained benefit in these children.

Key words: GH therapy, GH levels, provocative tests, growth rates.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Zucchini, P. Pirazzoli, F. Baronio, M. Gennari, M. O. Bal, A. Balsamo, S. Gualandi, and A. Cicognani
Effect on Adult Height of Pubertal Growth Hormone Retesting and Withdrawal of Therapy in Patients with Previously Diagnosed Growth Hormone Deficiency
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2006; 91(11): 4271 - 4276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Trop PediatrHome page
R. B. Nair, K. E. Elizabeth, S. Geetha, and S. Varghese
Mid Arm Circumference (MAC) and Body Mass Index (BMI) - The Two Important Auxologic Parameters in Neonates
J Trop Pediatr, October 1, 2006; 52(5): 341 - 345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]