This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kadish, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bolte, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kadish, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bolte, R. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surgery

PEDIATRICS Vol. 102 No. 1 July 1998, pp. 73-76

A Retrospective Review of Pediatric Patients With Epididymitis, Testicular Torsion, and Torsion of Testicular Appendages

Howard A. Kadish* and Robert G. Bolte*

From the * Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Emergency Department, Primary Children's Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Study Objective.  To compare historical features, physical examination findings, and testicular color Doppler ultrasound in pediatric patients with epididymitis, testicular torsion, and torsion of appendix testis.

Methods.  A retrospective review of patients with the diagnosis of epididymitis, testicular torsion, or torsion of appendix testis.

Results.  Ninety patients were included in the study (64 with epididymitis, 13 with testicular torsion, and 13 with torsion of appendix testis). Historical features did not differ among groups except for duration of symptoms. Of 13 patients with testicular torsion all had a tender testicle and an absent cremasteric reflex. When compared with the testicular torsion group, fewer patients with epididymitis had a tender testicle (69%) or an absent cremasteric reflex (14%). 62 (97%) patients with epididymitis had a tender epididymis and 43 (67%) had scrotal erythema/edema. By comparison, 3 (23%) and 5 (38%) patients with testicular torsion had a tender epididymis or scrotal erythema/edema, respectively. Doppler ultrasound showed decreased or absent blood flow in 8 patients, 7 of whom were diagnosed with testicular torsion. Ten out of 13 patients with testicular torsion had a salvageable testicle at the time of surgery.

Conclusion.  The physical examination is helpful in distinguishing among epididymitis, testicular torsion, and torsion of appendix testis. Patients presenting with a tender testicle and an absent cremasteric reflex were more likely to have a testicular torsion rather than epididymitis or torsion of appendix testis. An absent cremasteric reflex was the most sensitive physical finding for diagnosing testicular torsion. Color Doppler ultrasound is a useful adjunct in the evaluation of the acute scrotum when physical findings are equivocal.

Key words: acute scrotum, epididymitis, testicular torsion.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
E Rakha, F Puls, I Saidul, and P Furness
Torsion of the testicular appendix: importance of associated acute inflammation
J. Clin. Pathol., August 1, 2006; 59(8): 831 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Baldisserotto, J. C. K. de Souza, A. P. Pertence, and M. D. Dora
Color Doppler Sonography of Normal and Torsed Testicular Appendages in Children
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1287 - 1292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
Acute Scrotal Pain in Boys: Is It Torsion?
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, September 1, 1998; 1998(901): 17 - 17.
[Full Text]