This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mischler, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by Farrell, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mischler, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by Farrell, P. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neurology & Psychiatry

PEDIATRICS Vol. 102 No. 1 July 1998, pp. 44-52

Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening: Impact on Reproductive Behavior and Implications for Genetic Counseling

Received Sep 29, 1997; accepted Jan 26, 1998.

Elaine H. Mischler*, Benjamin S. WilfondDagger , Norman Fost§, Anita Laxova§, Catherine Reiser§, Christine M. Sauerparallel , Linda M. Makholm§, Guanghong Shen§, Lynn Feenan§, Catherine McCarthy*, and Philip M. Farrell§

From the * Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Dagger  Department of Pediatrics, University of Arizona, Tucson Arizona; § Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; and the parallel  Genetics Center, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Wisconsin.

Objective.  To evaluate the impact of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) on the reproductive knowledge and behavior of CF families and to determine if heterozygote detection with the immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) method in conjunction with DNA analysis (IRT/DNA) influences knowledge and attitudes about reproduction in false-positive families.

Methods.  The Wisconsin CF Neonatal Screening Project investigated 650 340 infants from 1985 to 1994 in a comprehensive randomized controlled trial to study both benefits and risks of newborn screening and to determine if early diagnosis would improve the prognosis of children with CF. Assessments of reproductive knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of 135 families of children diagnosed as having CF in both the early treatment group and control groups were made 3 months after diagnosis using a questionnaire which was completed by 100 families. The same questionnaire was administered 1 year later to evaluate retention of information. It was completed by 71 families. A follow-up assessment tool was also administered in 1994 and responses obtained from 73 families. Knowledge, attitudes, and behavior among false-positive families were also assessed at the time of the sweat test in 206 families who experienced IRT screening and 109 families tested with the IRT/DNA method. Follow-up assessments were completed 1 year later in 106 IRT families and 63 IRT/DNA families.

Results.  In families with a CF child, 95% initially understood that there was a 1 in 4 risk in subsequent pregnancies, and there was good retention of this information 1 year later. At the 1994 assessment, 52% of families had not yet conceived more children, but 74% of these already had children. In the couples in whom CF was diagnosed in the first child, 70% (95% confidence interval = 54% to 85%) conceived more children. There were 43 subsequent pregnancies in 31 families. Prenatal diagnosis was used by 26% of the families (8/31) for 21% of the pregnancies (9/43). There were 3 pregnancies with CF detected, all of which were carried to term. In the false-positive groups, >95% of families initially understood that their child definitely did not have CF. There was no difference between false-positive IRT and IRT/DNA groups, and the information was retained at 1 year. Follow-up assessment 1 year after negative sweat tests revealed that 7% of the IRT and 10% of the IRT/DNA families still thought about the results often or constantly. When asked whether the experience of screening affected feelings about having more children, an affirmative response was obtained in 4% of IRT families but in 17% of IRT/DNA families. One year later, more than half of the false-positive IRT/DNA families did not understand that they were at increased risk of having a child with CF.

Conclusions.  We conclude that CF neonatal screening does not have a significant impact on the reproductive behavior of most families and that prenatal diagnosis is not used by the majority of CF families. IRT/DNA testing experiences seem to affect attitudes about having more children, and some parents are confused about the implications of the results, even with genetic counseling. However, persistent concerns about the sweat test result are limited. Questions raised by this study confirm the need for more research regarding the process of genetic counseling and its impact on reproductive attitudes and behavior in the newborn screening setting.

Key words: cystic fibrosis, newborn screening, immunoreactive trypsinogen, carrier detection, reproductive decision making, prenatal diagnosis, genetic counseling, health policy.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
M. Farrell, L. Deuster, J. Donovan, and S. Christopher
Pediatric Residents' Use of Jargon During Counseling About Newborn Genetic Screening Results
Pediatrics, August 1, 2008; 122(2): 243 - 249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
M. H. Farrell and P. Kuruvilla
Assessment of Parental Understanding by Pediatric Residents During Counseling After Newborn Genetic Screening
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, March 1, 2008; 162(3): 199 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Policy Politics Nursing PracticeHome page
H. Bishop Hubbard
Policy Issues Related to Expanded Newborn Screening: A Review of Three Genetic/Metabolic Disorders
Policy Politics Nursing Practice, August 1, 2007; 8(3): 201 - 209.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
A. M. Comeau, F. J. Accurso, T. B. White, P. W. Campbell III, G. Hoffman, R. B. Parad, B. S. Wilfond, M. Rosenfeld, M. K. Sontag, J. Massie, et al.
Guidelines for Implementation of Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening Programs: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Workshop Report
Pediatrics, February 1, 2007; 119(2): e495 - e518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
S. M. Sawyer, B. Cerritelli, L. S. Carter, M. Cooke, J. A. Glazner, and J. Massie
Changing Their Minds With Time: A Comparison of Hypothetical and Actual Reproductive Behaviors in Parents of Children With Cystic Fibrosis
Pediatrics, September 1, 2006; 118(3): e649 - e656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
S. D. Grosse, C. A. Boyle, A. Kenneson, M. J. Khoury, and B. S. Wilfond
From Public Health Emergency to Public Health Service: The Implications of Evolving Criteria for Newborn Screening Panels
Pediatrics, March 1, 2006; 117(3): 923 - 929.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
K. Acharya, P. D. Ackerman, and L. F. Ross
Pediatricians' Attitudes Toward Expanding Newborn Screening
Pediatrics, October 1, 2005; 116(4): e476 - e484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
A. Tluczek, R. L. Koscik, P. M. Farrell, and M. J. Rock
Psychosocial Risk Associated With Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis: Parents' Experience While Awaiting the Sweat-Test Appointment
Pediatrics, June 1, 2005; 115(6): 1692 - 1703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
S. M. Sawyer and J. A. Glazner
What Follows Newborn Screening? An Evaluation of a Residential Education Program for Parents of Infants With Newly Diagnosed Cystic Fibrosis
Pediatrics, August 1, 2004; 114(2): 411 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
J C Polnay, A Davidge, C. Lyn U, and A R Smyth
Parental attitudes: antenatal diagnosis of cystic fibrosis
Arch. Dis. Child., October 1, 2002; 87(4): 284 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Policy Politics Nursing PracticeHome page
J. G. Twomey
Considerations for Policies Regarding Genetic Testing of Children
Policy Politics Nursing Practice, May 1, 2002; 3(2): 140 - 148.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
Committee on Bioethics
Ethical Issues With Genetic Testing in Pediatrics
Pediatrics, June 1, 2001; 107(6): 1451 - 1455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
D. J. Ciske, A. Haavisto, A. Laxova, L. Z. M. Rock, and P. M. Farrell
Genetic Counseling and Neonatal Screening for Cystic Fibrosis: An Assessment of the Communication Process
Pediatrics, April 1, 2001; 107(4): 699 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
M. H. Farrell, L. K. Certain, and P. M. Farrell
Genetic Counseling and Risk Communication Services of Newborn Screening Programs
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, February 1, 2001; 155(2): 120 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
T. Dudding, B. Wilcken, B. Burgess, J. Hambly, and G. Turner
Reproductive decisions after neonatal screening identifies cystic fibrosis
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., March 1, 2000; 82(2): 124F - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 BMJHome page
P. M Farrell
Early diagnosis of cystic fibrosis can improve children's growth
BMJ, October 10, 1998; 317(7164): 1017 - 1017.
[Full Text]