Advertising Disclaimer
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iskandar, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Oakes, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iskandar, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Oakes, W. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neurology & Psychiatry
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 101 No. 6 June 1998, pp. 1031-1036

Pitfalls in the Diagnosis of Ventricular Shunt Dysfunction: Radiology Reports and Ventricular Size

Received Jun 19, 1997; accepted Nov 26, 1997.

Bermans J. Iskandar*, Colleen McLaughlin*, Timothy B. Mapstone*, Paul A. Grabb*, and W. Jerry Oakes*, Dagger

From the Departments of * Pediatric Neurosurgery and Dagger  Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital, Birmingham, Alabama.

Introduction.  The diagnosis of shunt malfunction can be difficult even for the experienced clinician and may lead to disastrous circumstances when misinterpreted. Less experienced physicians may rely more on radiographic reports as a primary diagnostic modality. In this study, we evaluated the reliability of using these reports without accurate clinical assessment.

Methods.  All shunt revisions seen at Children's Hospital (Birmingham, AL) between January 1996 and August 1996 were reviewed, excluding patients with brain tumors, supratentorial extraaxial fluid collections, and infections. Sixty-eight patients underwent 100 operations for shunt malfunction. All patients had evidence of shunt blockage, disconnection, catheter malposition, or valve pressure incompatibility. The prospective radiographic interpretation of preoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans was reviewed in each case.

Results.  Twenty-four percent of the reports made no mention of shunt malfunction. In this group, the ventricular system was described as "unchanged," "stable," "normal," "unremarkable," "small," "smaller," "slit," "negative," and "no hydrocephalus," with no other comment to support a diagnosis of shunt malfunction. An additional 9% of reports contained the same terms, while also hinting at some other clinical or radiographic data that suggest the possibility of shunt failure (eg, a shunt disconnection seen on plain radiographs), despite the scan findings. In all patients in this group, symptoms improved after surgery.

Conclusion.  We conclude that as many as one third of patients presenting with shunt malfunction will not have the diagnosis of shunt malfunction supported by a prospective radiologic interpretation of brain imaging. Although the neurosurgical community can assess the clinical situation to determine the need for surgery, other clinicians can be easily reassured by a radiographic report that does not mention or diagnose shunt malfunction. Today, more than ever, nonneurosurgeons are being called on to evaluate complex clinical situations and may rely on radiographic reports.

Key words: hydrocephalus, ventricle size, radiology reports, ventricular shunt.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PNHome page
J. Malm and A. Eklund
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
Practical Neurology, February 1, 2006; 6(1): 14 - 27.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 AAP Grand RoundsHome page
J. H Piatt Jr
Clinical Recognition of CSF Shunt Failure
AAP Grand Rounds, June 1, 2001; 5(6): 56 - 56.
[Full Text] [PDF]