PEDIATRICS Vol. 101 No. 4 April 1998, p. e3

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE:
Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Letters, Automated Telephone Messages, or Both for Underimmunized Children in a Health Maintenance Organization

Received Nov 3, 1997; accepted Dec 23, 1997.

Tracy A. Lieu^*, Angela M. Capra^*, James Makol, Steven B. Black^§, Henry R. Shinefield^§, and for the Immunization Message Study Group

From the ^* Division of Research, Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, California;  Departments of Pediatrics, Permanente Medical Group, Fresno, Fairfield, Hayward, Oakland, Redwood City, Richmond, Roseville, San Francisco, Sacramento, Santa Rosa, and Vallejo, California; and the ^§ Kaiser Pediatric Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, California.

Background.  Immunization rates have improved in the United States, but are still far from the national 90% goal for the year 2000. There is scant evidence about the effectiveness and costs of automated telephone messages to improve immunization rates among privately insured children.

Objective.  To evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of sending letters, automated telephone messages, or both to families of underimmunized 20-month-olds in a health maintenance organization (HMO).

Methods.  In this randomized trial, underimmunized 20-month-olds identified by the HMO's computerized immunization tracking system were assigned to one of four interventions: 1) an automated telephone message alone; 2) a letter alone; 3) an automated telephone message followed by a letter 1 week later; and 4) a letter followed by an automated telephone message 1 week later. The primary outcome was receipt of any needed immunization by 24 months of age. Decision analysis was used to evaluate the projected cost-effectiveness of the alternative strategies.

Results.  A total of 648 children were randomized. A letter followed by a telephone message (58% immunized) was significantly better than either a letter alone (44% immunized) or a telephone message alone (44% immunized). A telephone message followed by a letter (53% immunized) also was more effective than either alone, although the differences were not statistically significant. Among a similar comparison group that received no systematic intervention, 36% were immunized. The estimated cost per child immunized was $7.00 using letters followed by automated telephone messages, $9.80 using automated telephone messages alone, and $10.50 using letters alone. Under alternative cost assumptions for automated telephone messages and mailed messages, the cost per child immunized ranged from $2.20 to $6.50.

Conclusions.  For underimmunized 20-month-olds in this HMO setting, letters followed by automated telephone messages were more effective and cost-effective than either message alone. The cost-effectiveness of automated telephone messages and letters may vary widely depending on the setting, and choices among strategies should be tailored to the populations being served.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?