This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howard, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Weitzman, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Howard, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Weitzman, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice

PEDIATRICS Vol. 101 No. 3 March 1998, pp. 423-428

Neonatal Circumcision and Pain Relief: Current Training Practices

Received Mar 26, 1997; accepted Aug 26, 1997.

Cynthia R. Howard*, Fred M. HowardDagger , Lynn C. Garfunkel*, Elisabeth A. de Blieck*, and Michael Weitzman*

From the Departments of * Pediatrics and of Dagger  Obstetrics and Gynecology, the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.

Objective.  We conducted a national survey of pediatric, family practice, and obstetrics and gynecology residency program directors to determine the curriculum content and predominant practices in US training programs with regard to neonatal circumcision and anesthesia/analgesia for the procedure.

Methods.  Residency directors of accredited programs were surveyed in two mailings of a forced response and short answer survey (response rate: 680/914, 74%; pediatrics 83%; family practice 72%; obstetrics 71%).

Results.  Pediatric residents were less likely than family practice [odds ratio (OR), 0.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.02-0.08] or obstetrical (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.08-0.23) residents to be taught circumcision. Training and local custom were rated as important determinants of medical responsibility for neonatal circumcision. Pediatric residents training in programs in which community pediatricians perform circumcisions were more likely to learn circumcision (OR, 39.0; 95% CI, 14.3-110.6) as were obstetric residents (OR, 79.0; 95% CI, 22.4-306.4) training in programs in which community obstetricians perform circumcision. In programs that teach circumcision, pediatric (84%; OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.7-7.1) and family practice (80%; OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.7-4.2) programs were more likely than obstetric programs (60%) to teach analgesia/anesthesia techniques to relieve procedural pain. Overall, 26% of programs that taught circumcision failed to provide instruction in anesthesia/analgesia for the procedure. Significant regional variations in training in circumcision and analgesia/anesthesia techniques were noted within and across medical specialties.

Conclusions.  Residency training standards are not consistent for pediatric, family practice, and obstetrical residents with regard to neonatal circumcision or instruction in analgesia/anesthesia for the procedure. Training with regard to pain relief is clearly inadequate for what remains a common surgical procedure in the United States. Given the overwhelming evidence that neonatal circumcision is painful and the existence of safe and effective anesthesia/analgesia methods, residency training in neonatal circumcision should include instruction in pain relief techniques.

Key words: neonatal circumcision, resident training.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
K. S. Ogle, L. McElroy, and B. Mavis
No Relief in Sight: Postgraduate Training in Pain Management
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, August 1, 2008; 25(4): 292 - 297.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
R. J. Soper, G. Brooks, K. Fletcher, and M. Sampson
A Training Model for Circumcision of the Newborn
Clinical Pediatrics, July 1, 2001; 40(7): 409 - 412.
[PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
K. J. S. Anand and and the International Evidence-Based Group for Neo
Consensus Statement for the Prevention and Management of Pain in the Newborn
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, February 1, 2001; 155(2): 173 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
A. Taddio, N. Pollock, C. Gilbert-MacLeod, K. Ohlsson, and G. Koren
Combined Analgesia and Local Anesthesia to Minimize Pain During Circumcision
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, June 1, 2000; 154(6): 620 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
Committee on Fetus and Newborn, Committee on Drugs and Canadian Paediatric Society, Fetus and Newborn Com
Prevention and Management of Pain and Stress in the Neonate
Pediatrics, February 1, 2000; 105(2): 454 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Obstet GynecolHome page
S. S. Erickson
A MODEL FOR TEACHING NEWBORN CIRCUMCISION
Obstet. Gynecol., May 1, 1999; 93(5): 783 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
L. G. Maxwell and M. Yaster
Analgesia for Neonatal Circumcision: No More Studies, Just Do It
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, May 1, 1999; 153(5): 444 - 445.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
R. S. Van Howe;, M. Butler-O'Hara, C. LeMoine, and R. Guillet
Pain Relief for Neonatal Circumcision: Serious Design Flaws?
Pediatrics, January 1, 1999; 103(1): 196 - 196.
[Full Text] [PDF]