This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mason, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Herrmann, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mason, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Herrmann, K. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Dentistry & Otolaryngology
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 101 No. 2 February 1998, pp. 221-228

Universal Infant Hearing Screening by Automated Auditory Brainstem Response Measurement

Received Jan 28, 1997; accepted Jun 18, 1997.

Judith A. Mason* and Kenneth R. HerrmannDagger

From the Departments of * Audiology Services and Dagger  Pediatrics, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii.

Background.  Our purpose was to identify infants with a bilateral, permanent, handicapping hearing loss and to provide them with amplification before age 6 months.

Methodology.  The study population consisted of 10 372 infants born during a 5-year period. Universal hearing screening by automated auditory brainstem response was done in the nursery. Infants who failed the screening test were followed up diagnostically. Infants who were not tested in the nursery were followed up as outpatients. Hearing aids were recommended for those infants who had bilateral hearing loss.

Results.  Successful screening in the nursery was achieved for 96% of infants. The failure rate was 4%. The incidence of bilateral loss requiring amplification was 1.4/1000. The false-positive rate was 3.5% after the initial screening and .2% when a two-stage screening procedure was used. The incidence of congenital bilateral hearing loss in the well population was 1/1000, and in the neonatal intensive care unit population, 5/1000. The cost of screening was $17 per infant, and the cost to identify each true bilateral hearing loss was $17 750. Amplification was recommended for 15 infants; well infants who used hearing aids before age 6 months achieved age-appropriate speech and language development.

Conclusions.  Mild, moderate, and severe bilateral, persistent hearing loss can be identified in the nursery by automated auditory brainstem response measurement to provide amplification before age 6 months and thus optimize speech and language development.

Key words: infant hearing screening, newborn hearing screening, neonatal hearing screening, universal newborn hearing screening, automated auditory brainstem response, bilateral hearing loss, congenital hearing loss.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJSLPHome page
A. P. Teoh and S. B. Chin
Transcribing the Speech of Children With Cochlear Implants: Clinical Application of Narrow Phonetic Transcriptions
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, November 1, 2009; 18(4): 388 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
J. E. McClay, T. N. Booth, D. A. Parry, R. Johnson, and P. Roland
Evaluation of Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss With Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, September 1, 2008; 134(9): 945 - 952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
Joint Committee on Infant Hearing
Year 2007 Position Statement: Principles and Guidelines for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs
Pediatrics, October 1, 2007; 120(4): 898 - 921.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
P. Gardner, E. Oitmaa, A. Messner, L. Hoefsloot, A. Metspalu, and I. Schrijver
Simultaneous Multigene Mutation Detection in Patients With Sensorineural Hearing Loss Through a Novel Diagnostic Microarray: A New Approach for Newborn Screening Follow-up
Pediatrics, September 1, 2006; 118(3): 985 - 994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
T. C. Wall, E. Senicz, H. H. Evans, A. Woolley, and J. M. Hardin
Hearing Screening Practices Among a National Sample of Primary Care Pediatricians
Clinical Pediatrics, July 1, 2006; 45(6): 559 - 566.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AJAHome page
R. K. Karzon and J. E. C. Lieu
Initial audiologic assessment of infants referred from well baby, special care, and neonatal intensive care unit nurseries.
Am J Audiol, June 1, 2006; 15(1): 14 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJAHome page
J. E. C. Lieu, R. K. Karzon, and C. C. Mange
Hearing screening in the neonatal intensive care unit: follow-up of referrals.
Am J Audiol, June 1, 2006; 15(1): 66 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
I. Schrijver
Hereditary Non-Syndromic Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Transforming Silence to Sound
J. Mol. Diagn., November 1, 2004; 6(4): 275 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
C. B. Prince, L. Miyashiro, Y. Weirather, and P. Heu
Epidemiology of Early Hearing Loss Detection in Hawaii
Pediatrics, May 1, 2003; 111(5): 1202 - 1206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
R. Keren, M. Helfand, C. Homer, H. McPhillips, and T. A. Lieu
Projected Cost-Effectiveness of Statewide Universal Newborn Hearing Screening
Pediatrics, November 1, 2002; 110(5): 855 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pediatr. Rev.Home page
J. Sokol and M. Hyde
Hearing Screening
Pediatr. Rev., May 1, 2002; 23(5): 155 - 162.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
H C Boshuizen, G J van der Lem, M A Kauffman-de Boer, G A van Zanten, A M Oudesluys-Murphy, and P H Verkerk
Costs of different strategies for neonatal hearing screening: a modelling approach
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., November 1, 2001; 85(3): F177 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. C. Thompson, H. McPhillips, R. L. Davis, T. A. Lieu, C. J. Homer, and M. Helfand
Universal Newborn Hearing Screening: Summary of Evidence
JAMA, October 24, 2001; 286(16): 2000 - 2010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
C. J. Clemens and S. A. Davis
Minimizing False-Positives in Universal Newborn Hearing Screening: A Simple Solution
Pediatrics, March 1, 2001; 107(3): 29e - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
C. R Kennedy, D. HALL, and A. DAVIS
Current topic: Neonatal screening for hearing impairment
Arch. Dis. Child., November 1, 2000; 83(5): 377 - 383.
[Full Text]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, American Academy of Audiology, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, and Directors of Speech and Hearing Programs in State
Year 2000 Position Statement: Principles and Guidelines for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs
Pediatrics, October 1, 2000; 106(4): 798 - 817.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
C. J. Clemens, S. A. Davis, and A. R. Bailey
The False-Positive in Universal Newborn Hearing Screening
Pediatrics, July 1, 2000; 106(1): 7e - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
G. M. Headley, D. E. Campbell, and J. S. Gravel
Effect of Neonatal Test Environment on Recording Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions
Pediatrics, June 1, 2000; 105(6): 1279 - 1285.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
A. R. Kemper and S. M. Downs
A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Newborn Hearing Screening Strategies
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, May 1, 2000; 154(5): 484 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
J. L. Mattsson
Ototoxicity: An Argument for Evaluation of the Cochlea in Safety Testing in Animals
Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2000; 28(1): 137 - 141.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
C. Meyer, J. Witte, A. Hildmann, K.-H. Hennecke, K.-U. Schunck, K. Maul, U. Franke, H. Fahnenstich, H. Rabe, R. Rossi, et al.
Neonatal Screening for Hearing Disorders in Infants at Risk: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Follow-up
Pediatrics, October 1, 1999; 104(4): 900 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. Zlotogora, R. J. Morell, and T. B. Friedman
Deafness and Mutations in the Connexin 26 Gene
N. Engl. J. Med., April 22, 1999; 340(16): 1288 - 1288.
[Full Text]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. L. Paradise
Universal Newborn Hearing Screening: Should We Leap Before We Look?
Pediatrics, March 1, 1999; 103(3): 670 - 672.
[Full Text]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
Task Force on Newborn and Infant Hearing
Newborn and Infant Hearing Loss: Detection and Intervention
Pediatrics, February 1, 1999; 103(2): 527 - 530.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
A UNIVERSAL INFANT HEARING SCREENING PROGRAM
Journal Watch (General), February 17, 1998; 1998(217): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]