This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, T.
Right arrow Articles by Graham-Pole, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, T.
Right arrow Articles by Graham-Pole, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Blood

PEDIATRICS Vol. 100 No. 6 December 1997, p. e1

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE:
Use of Alternative Therapies for Children With Cancer

Received Feb 17, 1997; accepted Jul 14, 1997.

Tracey Friedman*, William B. Slayton*, Linda S. AllenDagger , Brad H. Pollock*, Dagger , Marilyn Dumont-Driscoll*, Paulette Mehta*, and John Graham-Pole*

From the Departments of * Pediatrics and Dagger  Health Policy and Epidemiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.

Objective.  To compare the use of alternative therapy (AT) in families of children with cancer with its use in those with routine pediatric conditions.

Background and Rationale.  AT refers to healing practices such as therapeutic massage, acupuncture, and use of medicinal herbs that have become increasingly popular with the general public, but are not widely accepted by the medical profession. Although studies have investigated the use of AT in the families of both healthy children and children with cancer, no comparison of the incidence of its use between these two populations has been published. We hypothesized that AT was used more frequently among the families of children with cancer.

Methods.  Using a prevalence survey design, we interviewed 81 parents of children with cancer attending a pediatric hematology/oncology clinic and 80 parents of children attending a continuity care clinic for routine check-ups and acute care. We explored the types of AT being used, the reasons for its use, and the frequency with which it was discussed with the patient's physician.

Results.  1) Overall, 65% of the cancer group were using AT, compared with 51% of the control group. This was not statistically significant. 2) Prayer, exercise, and spiritual healing were three AT practices most often used by the cancer group, and prayer, massage, and spiritual healing by the control group. 3) Discussion of AT with the physician varied according to group, with 53% of the cancer patients discussing its use; income level, with 59% of parents in the higher income group discussing its use; and ethnicity, with 47% of whites discussing its use.

Conclusion.  Use of AT is not limited to the families of children with life-challenging illnesses, but is commonly used by those of children with routine pediatric problems. Pediatricians need to be aware that their patients may not tell them about AT practices they are using in addition to prescribed treatment.

Key words: alternative therapies, prayer, children, cancer, continuity care.