This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jocson, M. A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Schanler, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jocson, M. A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Schanler, R. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infectious Disease & Immunity

PEDIATRICS Vol. 100 No. 2 August 1997, pp. 240-243

The Effects of Nutrient Fortification and Varying Storage Conditions on Host Defense Properties of Human Milk

Received Aug 8, 1996; accepted Dec 20, 1996.

Maria A. L. Jocson*, Dagger , Edward O. Mason§, and Richard J. Schanler*, Dagger

From the * USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Dagger  Sections of Neonatology and § Infectious Disease, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas.

Objective.  Data are scarce regarding the effects of nutrient fortification and storage on the immunoprotective properties of human milk. These effects are important considerations when feeding premature infants. We hypothesized that total bacterial colony counts (TBCC) and immunoglobulin A (IgA) concentration were not affected by the addition of fortifier even when tested under extreme storage conditions and that osmolality of fortified human milk does not increase with storage.

Methods.  Ten frozen and five fresh milk samples from mothers of premature infants were divided into fortified and unfortified milk, and stored for 72 hours at either refrigerator or room temperature. Aliquots were obtained at 0 to 72 hours for TBCC, osmolality, and total IgA, and analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results.  Log10 TBCC in milk stored at refrigerator temperature for 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours were significantly greater in fortified vs unfortified milk; both increased similarly with storage. Osmolality was greater in fortified than unfortified milk; both increased by approximately 4% with storage. IgA concentration was not affected by fortification or storage. To simulate the usual nursery use of fortified human milk, a separate evaluation was performed. Fortified milk was stored at refrigerator temperature for 20 hours, warmed in a 40°C laboratory incubator for 20 minutes, and placed in a 34°C infant incubator for 4 hours. Samples for TBCC were obtained at 0, 20, and 24 hours and analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA. Log10 TBCC in fortified, refrigerated milk did not change over the 20-hour storage but increased during the simulated 4-hour usage.

Conclusions.  These findings may warrant consideration when using human milk in the neonatal nursery but support recommendations to use commercially fortified human milk within 24 hours.

Key words: fortified human milk, immunoprotective properties, premature infants.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Hum LactHome page
M. R. Tully
Recipient Prioritization and Use of Human Milk in the Hospital Setting
J Hum Lact, November 1, 2002; 18(4): 393 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
M De Curtis, M Candusso, C Pieltain, and J Rigo
Effect of fortification on the osmolality of human milk
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., September 1, 1999; 81(2): 141F - 143.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
R. J. Schanler, R. J. Shulman, and C. Lau
Feeding Strategies for Premature Infants: Beneficial Outcomes of Feeding Fortified Human Milk Versus Preterm Formula
Pediatrics, June 1, 1999; 103(6): 1150 - 1157.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 J Hum LactHome page
R. J. Schanler
Fortified Human Milk: Nature's Way to Feed Premature Infants
J Hum Lact, March 1, 1998; 14(1): 5 - 11.
[PDF]