PEDIATRICS Vol. 10 No. 3 September 1952, pp. 311-318
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WATERS, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by PRIOR, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WATERS, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by PRIOR, J. T.

CAT SCRATCH SYNDROME

WILLIAM J. WATERS M.D.1, SEYMOUR S. KALTER PH.D.2, and JOHN T. PRIOR M.D.3

1 The Department of Pediatrics, State University of New York, Medical Center at Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y.
2 The Department of Bacteriology, State University of New York, Medical Center at Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y.
3 The Department of Pathology, State University of New York, Medical Center at Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y.

The clinical, laboratory and pathologic findings of a series of cases of cat scratch syndrome have been reviewed. In spite of a variable clinical course, certain features associated with a selected group of laboratory tests appear to be constant enough to be of diagnostic value.

A history of contact with a cat and/or scratch which is usually associated with a peripheral skin lesion, lack of lymphangitis, presence of regional lymphadenopathy with tenderness to palpation are the most constant clinical findings. Fever, so frequently emphasized as a characteristic clinical sign, may be extremely variable in type and duration or entirely absent. A skin test with cat scratch antigen has been positive in all cases. Lacking this antigen, a negative Frei skin test in conjunction with a positive complement fixation test (Lygranum C. F.) is suggestive evidence for the diagnosis.

With positive evidence from the above data, biopsy of an affected gland with its relatively nonspecific pathologic picture is not considered essential for the establishment of the diagnosis of cat scratch syndrome.

Submitted on April 11, 1952