<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
   <channel rdf:about="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80">
      <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:tpmcgee@highwire.stanford.edu"/>
      <title>Pediatrics Subject Collection: Emergency Medicine</title>
      <link>http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80</link>
      <description>This feed contains articles for  Pediatrics Subject Collection "Emergency Medicine" </description>
      <prism:eIssn/>
      <prism:publicationName>Pediatrics</prism:publicationName>
      <prism:issn/>
      <items>
         <rdf:Seq>
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/5/e858?rss=1"/>
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/5/1424?rss=1"/>
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/4/e729?rss=1"/>
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/4/1233?rss=1"/>
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/3/918?rss=1"/>
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/2/485?rss=1"/>
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/1/65?rss=1"/>
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/1/e69?rss=1"/>
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/1/e166?rss=1"/>
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/123/6/e1039?rss=1"/>
         </rdf:Seq>
      </items>
      <image rdf:resource=""/>
   </channel>
   <image rdf:about="">
      <title>Pediatrics</title>
      <url/>
      <link>http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80</link>
   </image>
   <item rdf:about="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/5/e858?rss=1">
      <title><![CDATA[Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase-Enabled Subcutaneous Pediatric Rehydration [ARTICLES] ]]></title>
      <link>http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/5/e858?rss=1</link>
      <description>OBJECTIVES: The Increased Flow Utilizing Subcutaneously-Enabled (INFUSE)-Pediatric Rehydration Study was designed to assess efficacy, safety, and clinical utility of recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20)-facilitated subcutaneous rehydration in children 2 months to 10 years of age. 

METHODS: Patients with mild/moderate dehydration requiring parenteral treatment in US emergency departments were eligible for this phase IV, multicenter, single-arm study. They received subcutaneous injection of 1 mL rHuPH20 (150 U), followed by subcutaneous infusion of 20 mL/kg isotonic fluid over the first hour. Subcutaneous rehydration was continued as needed for up to 72 hours. Rehydration was deemed successful if it was attributed by the investigator primarily to subcutaneous fluid infusion and the child was discharged without requiring an alternative method of rehydration. 

RESULTS: Efficacy was evaluated in 51 patients (mean age: 1.9 years; mean weight: 11.2 kg). Initial subcutaneous catheter placement was achieved with 1 attempt for 46/51 (90.2%) of patients. Rehydration was successful for 43/51 (84.3%) of patients. Five patients (9.8%) were hospitalized but deemed to be rehydrated primarily through subcutaneous therapy, for a total of 48/51 (94.1%) of patients. No treatment-related systemic adverse events were reported, but 1 serious adverse event occurred (cellulitis at infusion site). Investigators found the procedure easy to perform for 96% of patients (49/51 patients), and 90% of parents (43/48 parents) were satisfied or very satisfied. 

CONCLUSIONS: rHuPH20-facilitated subcutaneous hydration seems to be safe and effective for young children with mild/moderate dehydration. Subcutaneous access is achieved easily, and the procedure is well accepted by clinicians and parents.</description>
      <dc:creator>Allen, C. H.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Etzwiler, L. S.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Miller, M. K.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Maher, G.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Mace, S.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Hostetler, M. A.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Smith, S. R.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Reinhardt, N.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Hahn, B.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Harb, G.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>for the INcreased Flow Utilizing Subcutaneously-Enabled-(INFUSE) Pediatric Rehydration Study Collaborative Research Group,  </dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-01</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>doi:10.1542/peds.2008-3588</dc:identifier>
      <dc:title>Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase-Enabled Subcutaneous Pediatric Rehydration</dc:title>
      <dc:publisher>American Academy of Pediatrics</dc:publisher>
      <prism:number>5</prism:number>
      <prism:volume>124</prism:volume>
      <prism:endingPage>867</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:startingPage>858</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
   </item>
   <item rdf:about="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/5/1424?rss=1">
      <title><![CDATA[Pediatric Burn Injuries Treated in US Emergency Departments Between 1990 and 2006 [ARTICLES] ]]></title>
      <link>http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/5/1424?rss=1</link>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: The goal was to examine comprehensively the patterns and trends of burn-related injuries in children, adolescents, and young adults treated in US emergency departments between 1990 and 2006. 

METHODS: Through use of the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database, cases of nonfatal burn-related injuries were selected by using diagnosis codes for burns (scalds, thermal, chemical, radiation, electrical, and not specified). Sample weights were used to calculate national estimates. US Census Bureau data were used to calculate injury rates per 10000 individuals [&amp;le;]20 years of age. Computation of relative risks with 95% confidence intervals was performed. 

RESULTS: An estimated 2054563 patients [&amp;le;]20 years of age were treated in US emergency departments for burn-related injuries, with an average of 120856 cases per year. Boys constituted 58.6% of case subjects. Children &lt;6 years of age sustained the majority of injuries (57.7%), and more than one half of all injuries (59.5%) resulted from thermal burns. The body parts injured most frequently were the hand/finger (36.0%), followed by the head/face (21.1%). Of the 1542913 cases for which locale was recorded, 91.7% occurred at home. The rate of burn-related injuries per 10000 children decreased 31% over the 17-year time period. 

CONCLUSIONS: Burn-related injuries are a serious problem for individuals [&amp;le;]20 years of age and are potentially preventable. Children &lt;6 years of age consistently sustained a disproportionately large number of injuries during the study period. Increased efforts are needed to improve burn-prevention strategies that target households with young children.</description>
      <dc:creator>D'Souza, A. L.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Nelson, N. G.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>McKenzie, L. B.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-01</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>doi:10.1542/peds.2008-2802</dc:identifier>
      <dc:title>Pediatric Burn Injuries Treated in US Emergency Departments Between 1990 and 2006</dc:title>
      <dc:publisher>American Academy of Pediatrics</dc:publisher>
      <prism:number>5</prism:number>
      <prism:volume>124</prism:volume>
      <prism:endingPage>1430</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:startingPage>1424</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
   </item>
   <item rdf:about="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/4/e729?rss=1">
      <title><![CDATA[Estimating Blood Loss: Comparative Study of the Accuracy of Parents and Health Care Professionals [ARTICLES] ]]></title>
      <link>http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/4/e729?rss=1</link>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: Hematemesis and hematochezia are not uncommon presenting complaints in children. The amount of blood loss reported by the parent is likely to influence the pediatrician's decision regarding investigations and management. Currently, there are only very limited data regarding the ability of laypersons to estimate blood losses visually. This study investigated the accuracy of parents, in comparison to pediatric health care professionals, in estimating blood loss volumes. 

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective, single-blinded study including 227 participants, comprising 131 parents, 58 nurses, and 38 doctors. Participants visually estimated the volume of 1 randomly allocated sample from each of the 2 categories: (1) 1, 5, or 10 mL of artificial blood applied to a diaper (simulated hematochezia) and (2) 5, 10, or 50 mL placed in a kidney-dish (simulated hematemesis). An "error factor" (=, estimated volume/actual volume shown) was used to facilitate comparisons. 

RESULTS: Parents provided the most inaccurate estimates overall, although individual accuracy varied considerably. The largest overestimate (518 mL) and the highest error factor (23.4) were recorded in a parent; overall, 71% of the estimates provided by parents were overestimates. The highest proportion of accurate estimates ({+/-}50% of actual volume) was recorded by nurses (29%). Doctors had a tendency to underestimate volumes (62% of the estimates were less than half the actual volume). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the performance of nurses and doctors. Health care professionals tended to overestimate small volumes and underestimate large volumes. Professional experience had no relevant impact on accuracy, nor did parental gender or age. 

CONCLUSIONS: Visual estimation of blood losses is highly inaccurate, both by laypersons and by health care professionals. Physicians should, therefore, base management decisions primarily on clinical findings and not overly rely on the history provided, or their own estimates.</description>
      <dc:creator>Tebruegge, M.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Misra, I.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Pantazidou, A.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Padhye, A.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Maity, S.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Dwarakanathan, B.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Donath, S.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Curtis, N.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Nerminathan, V.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-01</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>doi:10.1542/peds.2009-0592</dc:identifier>
      <dc:title>Estimating Blood Loss: Comparative Study of the Accuracy of Parents and Health Care Professionals</dc:title>
      <dc:publisher>American Academy of Pediatrics</dc:publisher>
      <prism:number>4</prism:number>
      <prism:volume>124</prism:volume>
      <prism:endingPage>736</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:startingPage>729</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
   </item>
   <item rdf:about="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/4/1233?rss=1">
      <title><![CDATA[Joint Policy Statement--Guidelines for Care of Children in the Emergency Department [FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS] ]]></title>
      <link>http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/4/1233?rss=1</link>
      <description>Children who require emergency care have unique needs, especially when emergencies are serious or life-threatening. The majority of ill and injured children are brought to community hospital emergency departments (EDs) by virtue of their geography within communities. Similarly, emergency medical services (EMS) agencies provide the bulk of out-of-hospital emergency care to children. It is imperative, therefore, that all hospital EDs have the appropriate resources (medications, equipment, policies, and education) and staff to provide effective emergency care for children. This statement outlines resources necessary to ensure that hospital EDs stand ready to care for children of all ages, from neonates to adolescents. These guidelines are consistent with the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine's report on the future of emergency care in the United States health system. Although resources within emergency and trauma care systems vary locally, regionally, and nationally, it is essential that hospital ED staff and administrators and EMS systems' administrators and medical directors seek to meet or exceed these guidelines in efforts to optimize the emergency care of children they serve. This statement has been endorsed by the Academic Pediatric Association, American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Physician Assistants, American College of Osteopathic Emergency Physicians, American College of Surgeons, American Heart Association, American Medical Association, American Pediatric Surgical Association, Brain Injury Association of America, Child Health Corporation of America, Children's National Medical Center, Family Voices, National Association of Children's Hospitals and Related Institutions, National Association of EMS Physicians, National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians, National Association of State EMS Officials, National Committee for Quality Assurance, National PTA, Safe Kids USA, Society of Trauma Nurses, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, and The Joint Commission.</description>
      <dc:creator>American Academy of Pediatrics,  </dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine,  </dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>American College of Emergency Physicians,  </dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Pediatric Committee,  </dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Emergency Nurses Association Pediatric Committee,  </dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-01</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>doi:10.1542/peds.2009-1807</dc:identifier>
      <dc:title>Joint Policy Statement--Guidelines for Care of Children in the Emergency Department</dc:title>
      <dc:publisher>American Academy of Pediatrics</dc:publisher>
      <prism:number>4</prism:number>
      <prism:volume>124</prism:volume>
      <prism:endingPage>1243</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:startingPage>1233</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:section>FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS</prism:section>
   </item>
   <item rdf:about="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/3/918?rss=1">
      <title><![CDATA[Physical Education Class Injuries Treated in Emergency Departments in the US in 1997-2007 [ARTICLES] ]]></title>
      <link>http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/3/918?rss=1</link>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: The goal was to describe the epidemiological features of physical education (PE)-related injuries treated in US emergency departments. 

METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted with data for children and adolescents (5-18 years of age) from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance Study of the US Consumer Product Safety Commission, from 1997 through 2007. Sample weights provided by the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System were used to calculate national estimates of PE-related injuries. Trend significance of the number of PE-related injuries over time was analyzed by using linear regression analysis. 

RESULTS: An estimated 405305 children and adolescents were treated in emergency departments for PE-related injuries. The annual number of cases increased 150% during the study period (P = .001). Nearly 70% of PE-related injuries occurred during 6 activities, that is, running, basketball, football, volleyball, soccer, and gymnastics. Boys' injuries were more likely to involve the head, to be diagnosed as a laceration or fracture, to be attributable to contact with a person or structure, and to occur during group activities. Girls' injuries were more likely to involve the lower extremities, to be strains and sprains, to be acute noncontact injuries, and to occur during individual activities. 

CONCLUSION: More research is needed to identify the cause of the increase in PE-related injuries, to examine the gender difference in PE-related injuries, and to determine appropriate injury prevention solutions and policies.</description>
      <dc:creator>Nelson, N. G.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Alhajj, M.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Yard, E.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Comstock, D.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>McKenzie, L. B.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-01</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>doi:10.1542/peds.2008-3843</dc:identifier>
      <dc:title>Physical Education Class Injuries Treated in Emergency Departments in the US in 1997-2007</dc:title>
      <dc:publisher>American Academy of Pediatrics</dc:publisher>
      <prism:number>3</prism:number>
      <prism:volume>124</prism:volume>
      <prism:endingPage>925</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:startingPage>918</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
   </item>
   <item rdf:about="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/2/485?rss=1">
      <title><![CDATA[Pediatric Patient Safety in Emergency Departments: Unit Characteristics and Staff Perceptions [ARTICLES] ]]></title>
      <link>http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/2/485?rss=1</link>
      <description>OBJECTIVES: The goals were (1) to describe emergency department (ED) characteristics thought to be related to patient safety within the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network, (2) to measure staff perceptions of the climate of safety in EDs, and (3) to measure associations between ED characteristics and a climate of safety. 

METHODS: Twenty-one EDs were surveyed to assess physical structure, staffing patterns, overcrowding, medication administration, teamwork, and methods for promoting patient safety. A validated survey on the climate of safety was administered to all emergency department staff members. Safety climate scores were compared to evaluate associations with ED characteristics. 

RESULTS: A total of 1747 staff members (49%) responded to the survey on the climate of safety. A minority of EDs had organized safety activities such as safety committees (48%) or walk-rounds (38%), used computerized physician order entry (38%), had ED pharmacists (19%), or had formal physician/registered nurse teams (38%). The majority (67%) treated patients in hallways. Most (67%) varied staffing on the basis of seasonal patient volume. Of the 1747 ED staff members (49%) responding to the survey, there was a wide range (28%-82%) in the proportion reporting a positive safety climate. Physicians' ratings of the climate of safety were higher than nurses' ratings, and perceptions varied according to work experience. Characteristics associated with an improved climate of safety were a lack of ED overcrowding, a sick call back-up plan for physicians, and the presence of an ED safety committee. 

CONCLUSIONS: Large variability existed among EDs in structures and processes thought to be associated with patient safety and in staff perception of the safety climate. Several ED characteristics were associated with a positive climate of safety.</description>
      <dc:creator>Shaw, K. N.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Ruddy, R. M.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Olsen, C. S.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Lillis, K. A.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Mahajan, P. V.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Dean, J. M.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Chamberlain, J. M.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>for the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network,  </dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-01</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>doi:10.1542/peds.2008-2858</dc:identifier>
      <dc:title>Pediatric Patient Safety in Emergency Departments: Unit Characteristics and Staff Perceptions</dc:title>
      <dc:publisher>American Academy of Pediatrics</dc:publisher>
      <prism:number>2</prism:number>
      <prism:volume>124</prism:volume>
      <prism:endingPage>493</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:startingPage>485</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
   </item>
   <item rdf:about="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/1/65?rss=1">
      <title><![CDATA[Epinephrine Auto-injectors: Is Needle Length Adequate for Delivery of Epinephrine Intramuscularly? [ARTICLES] ]]></title>
      <link>http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/1/65?rss=1</link>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: Studies show that intramuscular epinephrine results in peak plasma concentrations of epinephrine faster than the subcutaneous route, and therefore, epinephrine is recommended to be administered intramuscularly. The objective of this study was to determine if the needle length on epinephrine auto-injectors is adequate to deliver epinephrine intramuscularly in children. 

METHODS: Patients between the ages of 1 and 12 years who presented to a children's hospital were enrolled in the study. Ultrasound was used to determine the depth from the skin to the vastus lateralis muscle. The patient's body mass index was recorded. The data were analyzed using simple descriptive statistics, and logistic regression was used to identify variables that might predict whether or not the needle length was exceeded. 

RESULTS: A total of 256 children were enrolled. Of these, 158 children weighed less than 30 kilograms and would be prescribed the 0.15mg epinephrine auto-injector. Nineteen of these children (12%) had a skin to muscle surface distance of &gt;[1/2]'' and would not receive epinephrine intramuscularly from current auto-injectors. There were 98 children weighing [&amp;ge;]30 kilograms who would receive the 0.3 mg epinephrine auto-injector. Of these 98 children, a total of 29 (30%) had a skin to muscle surface distance of &gt;[5/8]'' and would not receive epinephrine intramuscularly. 

CONCLUSION: The needle on epinephrine auto-injectors is not long enough to reach the muscle in a significant number of children. Increasing the needle length on the auto-injectors would increase the likelihood that more children receive epinephrine by the recommended intramuscular route.</description>
      <dc:creator>Stecher, D.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Bulloch, B.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Sales, J.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Schaefer, C.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Keahey, L.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-01</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>doi:10.1542/peds.2008-3388</dc:identifier>
      <dc:title>Epinephrine Auto-injectors: Is Needle Length Adequate for Delivery of Epinephrine Intramuscularly?</dc:title>
      <dc:publisher>American Academy of Pediatrics</dc:publisher>
      <prism:number>1</prism:number>
      <prism:volume>124</prism:volume>
      <prism:endingPage>70</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:startingPage>65</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
   </item>
   <item rdf:about="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/1/e69?rss=1">
      <title><![CDATA[Estimation of Optimal CPR Chest Compression Depth in Children by Using Computer Tomography [ARTICLES] ]]></title>
      <link>http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/1/e69?rss=1</link>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: Pediatric consensus-driven cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines target chest compression (CC) depths of one third to one half anterior-posterior (AP) chest depth. Estimates for this target as assessed by computed tomography (CT) measurements of internal and external AP chest dimensions could direct future pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines. 

METHODS: A total of 280 consecutive chest CT scans in permuted blocks of 20 for each of 14 age divisions between 0 and 8 years were reconstructed and analyzed. External and internal AP depths were measured at midsternum, and residual chest depth was calculated at simulated one-third and one-half AP compressions. 

RESULTS: After a simulated compression calculation, one-half external AP depth CC would result in residual internal depth of &lt;10 mm for 94% (263 of 280) of children 3 months to 8 years. For a one-third external AP CC, only 0.4% (1 of 280) of children 3 months to 8 years had a calculated residual internal chest depth &lt;10 mm. 

CONCLUSIONS: By using CT reconstruction estimates of chest dimensions across the developmental spectrum from 0 to 8 years of age, we demonstrated that a simulated CC targeting approximately one-third external AP chest depth seems radiographically appropriate for children aged 3 months to 8 years, whereas simulated CC targeting approximately one-half external AP chest depth seems radiographically to be too deep, resulting in residual internal chest depth of &lt;10 mm for most patients of this age.</description>
      <dc:creator>Braga, M. S.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Dominguez, T. E.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Pollock, A. N.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Niles, D.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Meyer, A.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Myklebust, H.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Nysaether, J.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Nadkarni, V.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-01</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>doi:10.1542/peds.2009-0153</dc:identifier>
      <dc:title>Estimation of Optimal CPR Chest Compression Depth in Children by Using Computer Tomography</dc:title>
      <dc:publisher>American Academy of Pediatrics</dc:publisher>
      <prism:number>1</prism:number>
      <prism:volume>124</prism:volume>
      <prism:endingPage>74</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:startingPage>69</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
   </item>
   <item rdf:about="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/1/e166?rss=1">
      <title><![CDATA[Equipment for Ambulances [FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS] ]]></title>
      <link>http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/124/1/e166?rss=1</link>
      <description>Almost 4 decades ago, the Committee on Trauma of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) developed a list of standardized equipment for ambulances. Beginning in 1988, the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) published a similar list. The 2 organizations collaborated on a joint document published in 2000, and the National Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP) participated in the 2005 revision. The 2005 revision included resources needed on ambulances for appropriate homeland security. All 3 organizations adhere to the principle that emergency medical services (EMS) providers at all levels must have the appropriate equipment and supplies to optimize prehospital delivery of care. The document was written to serve as a standard for the equipment needs of emergency ambulance services in both the United States and Canada. 

EMS providers ...</description>
      <dc:creator>American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma,  </dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>American College of Emergency Physicians,  </dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>National Association of EMS Physicians,  </dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Pediatric Equipment Guidelines Committee--Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC) Partnership for Children Stakeholder Group,  </dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>American Academy of Pediatrics,  </dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-01</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>doi:10.1542/peds.2009-1094</dc:identifier>
      <dc:title>Equipment for Ambulances</dc:title>
      <dc:publisher>American Academy of Pediatrics</dc:publisher>
      <prism:number>1</prism:number>
      <prism:volume>124</prism:volume>
      <prism:endingPage>171</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:startingPage>166</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:section>FROM THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS</prism:section>
   </item>
   <item rdf:about="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/123/6/e1039?rss=1">
      <title><![CDATA[A Prospective Comparison of Diaphragmatic Ultrasound and Chest Radiography to Determine Endotracheal Tube Position in a Pediatric Emergency Department [ARTICLES] ]]></title>
      <link>http://pediatrics.aappublications.org:80/cgi/content/short/123/6/e1039?rss=1</link>
      <description>BACKGROUND. Investigators report endotracheal tube misplacement in up to 40% of emergent intubations. The standard elements of confirmation have significant limitations. Diaphragmatic ultrasound is a potentially viable addition to the confirmatory process. Our primary hypothesis is that ultrasound is equivalent to chest radiography in determining endotracheal tube position within the airway in emergent pediatric intubations. 

METHODS. We enrolled a prospective, convenience sample from all intubated patients in our emergency department. The primary outcome was the agreement between diaphragmatic ultrasound and chest radiography for endotracheal tube position. On ultrasound, tracheal placement equaled bilateral diaphragmatic motion, bronchial placement equaled unilateral diaphragmatic motion, and esophageal placement equaled no or paradoxical diaphragmatic motion during delivery of positive pressure. Study sonographers were blind to radiographic results. Our secondary outcome was the timeliness of ultrasound versus chest radiography results. Our institutional review board approved this study with a waiver of informed consent. 

RESULTS. One hundred twenty-seven patients were enrolled. In 24 (19%) patients, the endotracheal tube was in the mainstem bronchus on chest radiography. There were no esophageal intubations in the sample. Ultrasound and chest radiography agreed on endotracheal tube placement in 106 patients (94 tracheal and 12 mainstem), for an overall agreement of 0.83. The sensitivity of ultrasound for tracheal placement was 0.91. The specificity of ultrasound for mainstem intubation was 0.50. Thirty-four patients had a second ultrasound by a separate, blinded sonographer; 33 of 34 of the results of the second sonographer were in agreement with the initial sonogram, for an interrater agreement of 97%. Clinically useful chest radiography results took a median of 8 minutes longer to achieve than ultrasound results. 

CONCLUSIONS. Diaphragmatic ultrasound was not equivalent to chest radiography for endotracheal tube placement within the airway. However, ultrasound results were timelier, detected more misplacements than standard confirmation alone, and were highly reproducible between sonographers.</description>
      <dc:creator>Kerrey, B. T.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Geis, G. L.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Quinn, A. M.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Hornung, R. W.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Ruddy, R. M.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-01</dc:date>
      <dc:identifier>doi:10.1542/peds.2008-2828</dc:identifier>
      <dc:title>A Prospective Comparison of Diaphragmatic Ultrasound and Chest Radiography to Determine Endotracheal Tube Position in a Pediatric Emergency Department</dc:title>
      <dc:publisher>American Academy of Pediatrics</dc:publisher>
      <prism:number>6</prism:number>
      <prism:volume>123</prism:volume>
      <prism:endingPage>1044</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:startingPage>1039</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
      <prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
   </item>
</rdf:RDF>